The 2016 Present elect
is Donald Trump, and social media can not believe it.
With 74% of American
citizens engaging on social media through platforms such as Twitter and
Facebook, it's not unusual that candidates utilize these mediums in numerous
ways to aid their campaign such as:
-
Creating the ideal public persona
- Targeting
opponents
- Attracting
potential supporters in ways that are comfortable with them
- Aligning
voters with candidate’s goals
A main contribution
to Trumps success is because he engaged with supporters through digital
platforms. Not only is social media a good way to engage with supporters, but
it also greatly aided Trump by reaching out to people willing to become
involved with the campaign. By urging supporters to act on behalf of a specific
candidate, this provides campaigns with free labour and most importantly
enthusiastic people who faithfully encourage other audiences such as friends,
family, and community members to either vote on election day, or also partake
in the campaign. Social media facilitated the word-of-mouth campaign and this
proved it to be beneficial and more expensive than previous methods like TV ads
or radio commercials. The entire election was just choosing the lesser of
two evils and given the fact that mainstream media was primarily anti-trump,
voters turned to alternative media sources in hopes of seeking out the truths
behind each candidate’s claims.
Facebook and Twitter
have been receiving shockwaves from the recent 2016 Presidential election
because of unexpected victory from the Republican candidate, Trump. It’s been
said that social
media needed Trumps bigot remarks, like an addict needs a hit… and
Americans bought into the notion of Trump and his approach towards the
election. Social media users fuelled the success of Trump by retweeting,
reposting, or sharing news/videos regarding him on networking sites.
Trump had success on
social media in a number of ways:
Trump dominated the
Twitter game by having four million more followers on Twitter than Clinton and The Hill states
the overall online interest for Trump was three times greater than Clinton,
while also being the most mentioned on Twitter and Facebook.
The claims of 'media making the man' relate
to Trump and his usage of social media, like TV did with John Kennedy’s
election. Trump in a sense, earned free media due
to the controversial remarks he would make, thus publicizing his name and
providing an opportunity to explain himself. Social media won the election for
Trump. As I say, good or bad, at least people are talking about you… and I
assume that's the mentality trump had.
Arguments concerning
the low voter count is said to have had impact on the results due to the
substantially lower turnout in the 2016 election than in prior years. Clintons
campaign can be said to have failed because of Slacktivism; supporters
displaying their commitment via Facebook, however not actually submitting
votes. Clinton based her campaign around old media and conventional strategies,
and in the end this hurt her chance of becoming the first female President of
the US. Clinton unlike Trump, never actually tweeted herself, she used social
media in a conventional way whereas Trump used it to drive news cycles and
create a form of authenticity by speaking directly to voters outside the
mainstream filters.
Trump targeted the
working-class and in America they are categorized as being mostly without
college degrees and he spoke about things they cared about such as: sexuality,
marriage, liberty, religion, abortion and gun rights. He addressed the public
on elementary level vocabulary and as a Canadian watching the broadcasts, I
never assumed he would win because of the lack of knowledge he has and how
unfortunate it is when he presents himself and speaks publicly. Also, I did not
think America would make transition from Obama to Trump because of how
politically incorrect he is regarding oppression of race, gender and class etc.
friends…… he has the best words… didn’t you know?
Trump along with Clinton had pre-existing social establishment
prior to the 2016 election. With Hilary being married to Bill and her presence
within the Government since the 80s and Trump being a celebrity on The
Apprentice, Americans had already established opinions regarding the two.
Does this even need a caption...?
There is a distrust
that lies within American citizens and mainstream media and this suggests that
it’s the most influential factor regarding Trumps win. Many voters will change
the channel upon encountering a political TV ad because they are often demeaning
and infused with bias. Instead, when candidates engage in social media it
receives a positive response because ‘mainstream’ news channels do not portray
stories fully, accurately or fairly therefore preventing the truth from
prevailing. A lot of people supported Trump because he shut down
mainstream media and fought back against them; this caused citizens to support
his campaign by showing leadership. This proves that Americans were impressed
with Trumps unruly perspective and considered him a better candidate than
Hilary.
The list goes on and
on regarding the things Trump did wrong for his campaign and vise-versa for
Clinton however, what do you think is the main reason Trump won? Do you feel
Trump will alter his controversial statements regarding “building walls to keep
others out” among many more now that he has actually assumed the Presidency
role, or will it all go downhill? (aka do you think he will mature and deviate
from his bigot remarks?)
No comments:
Post a Comment