Warner
describes the characteristics of a public sphere as being self-organized, a
public relation among strangers, speech is both personal and impersonal and it
is constituted simply by attention. Habermas continues by stating the
public sphere is any given place where opinions are formed. And thus,
individuals gathered in public spheres to discuss controversial issues because
it is easily accessible by mass audiences, individuals are able to voice
concerns, and it gives many various opinions (both bias and unbiased). The use
of citizen media is beneficial towards the virtual public sphere because it allows audience
members to join a participatory culture by becoming active members, voicing the
truths about society, and sparking social change through democratized
potential.
Costanza-Chock
explains the benefits of citizen media in social movements and claims that the
power of citizen reporting’s promotes the exposure of various viewpoints that
are unlike mainstream media, raw footage and opinions provides richer
storytelling rather than CNN, a mainstream, biased, media output. Matthew Ingram discusses the potential citizen media
withholds that can promote democratization
of distribution which permits
the incoming of news from multiple output sources at any
given time.
News
channels and other media outputs are unable to be at every crime scene or news
story however with citizen media, individuals are telling their perspective of
the story at that present time. Citizen media aids with the democratization of
media by capturing evidence of powerful institutions acting unlawfully. This
can hold people accountable for their actions. Often we encounter news channels
that provide us with information that is framed in order to fit societal norms,
alter perceptions on government and contain an abundance of bias. Citizen media
encourages alternative perspectives and raw materials, which allows viewers to
assume conclusions on their own terms.
Technology
has imbedded itself within our everyday lives, it is routine to reach for your
cellphone while coming across police brutality or actions deviant from societal
norms. Technology promotes citizen media by reaching mass audiences on social
platforms to recruit participants in order to drive a social change.
Stephen
Bijan suggests citizen media has developed a new common
sense about race in America from a global standpoint. The
#BlackLivesMatter utilizes social media platforms to transgress against corrupt
authority figures and expose the injustice black people face in their daily
lives. Through the viral videos of police officers unlawfully killing and
hurting black people, this hashtag has raised an abundance of controversy from
members of society worldwide. Similar to the Occupy Wall Street movement, this
protest was a form of social activism with
an open,
leader-ful base.
Therefore,
the use of citizen media has greatly aided the #BlackLivesMatter movement and many others by raising
awareness of an ongoing issue at a global platform that has yet to be resolved
through twitter, Facebook, protests etc by exposing truths of authority
corruption, altering the lived experience of Blacks, and altering society’s
perceptions on race. Citizens participating in acquiring media about the BLM movement have transformed into
broadcasters in the sense that they become the direct sources for information.
The more exposure of injustice and stereotypes within society allows for
awareness to be raised in hopes to shrink the inequality gap.
"Powerful
as these videos are for mobilizing activists, they may be more powerful in
bringing new participants into the racial justice movement,” – Dan Gillmor, an
Arizona State University Professor.
No comments:
Post a Comment