Communication technology and social media has the
capability to transmit information in digital form at a global and rapid pace.
This has become a global commodity due to the increase of alternative mediums
to choose from, and the influence technological devices have within our daily
lives. In todays society, members of society are able to partake in affordances
without many limitations resulting in the world’s interconnectedness being at
and all time high. With many technologies available, the rise of citizen media
has become prominent in society. This
is due to the inability of news channels to be everywhere at every time,
capturing live footage of a potential news story… it’s just not realistic.
However, citizens are everywhere and now being accompanied with some sort of
technological device, idea of citizen media arises in attempts for full
coverage. Citizen media allows
everyday individuals to join virtual conversations regarding matters of
individual importance. Affordances such as Facebook,
Blogging and twitter have developed an opportunity for the public to express
opinions, thoughts and beliefs with others without judgement. The rise of the
online community has aided the use of citizen media due to the accessibility
and participation seen by members of society. Citizen
media is beneficial for societies because they refer to the ways in which
audience members can actively participate in the media using the different
resources accessible to them. Citizens are able to easily whip out their phone
and snap a picture or send out a tweet regarding an altercation they just
encountered, and thus their contribution to the matter.
Citizen media is referred to as a concept and a
practice due to the ability and flow of free speech within societies. Citizen
media comes in many alternative forms and individuals can participate in a
plethora of ways such as: blog posts, citizen journalism, social media
(participating in hashtags etc.).
Citizen
media contains a structure that is either open or closed.
The
article Mic Check! Media Cultures and the Occupy
Movement by Sasha Costanza-Chock touched briefly on the concept of open
vs closed social movement cultures.
· It was described along an axis with a
top town (vertical) message control on one hand and on the other hand,
participatory (horizontal) media making.
·
Practices that
promote open and transparent communication include public live notes during
General Assembly, live streaming and making notes of communications. Occupy was
not a leaderless but more so a leader-full movement
·
the closed system
represents the old way of doing things: broadcasting from a single control
point to a passive mass audience and allowing for virtually no feedback or
participation. Or when there is a feedback channel, it's narrow and tightly
controlled
Citizen
media allows for diversity and alternative perspectives in regards to news
stories. Often news channels frame stories in specific ways that may positively
reflect the government and their ideologies while demeaning the challenging
side. Withholding all forms of the truth from the public can influence
citizen’s ideologies and thus creating a bias against cultural, social or
political groups that challenge the government and their ideologies imposed on
societies. Citizen media diversifies news in the sense that it allows for raw
footage/reports and encourages people of society to make decisions regarding
the matter on their own terms rather than being suggested to support a specific
claim.
Have
you ever participated in citizen media in ways that offer alternative
perspectives (that deviate from the suggested norm) for members of society? How
much were you willing to risk in attempt of revealing the truths?
No comments:
Post a Comment